Monday, August 21, 2017

Charlottesville Ruminations


Charlottesville

And My Uncertain Ruminations

Written by my alter ego – the Panhandling Philosopher

 

            There are times when full of myself I have imagined I had the needed words of wisdom to address a subject. In early August I attended the Glen Workshop. A friend had told me how Barry Moser had an impact on his working to create art at a difficult time in his life. Moser is a warm crusty sort of person. He is kind but is at war with presumptions of certainty that go soften with claims of knowledge beyond the fragility of our humanity. Reflecting on what I have perceived after the events in Charlottesville, I am seeking to write as if Barry Moser is a reader. I feel like he would instantly see through any claim of divine wisdom I might momentarily imagine I possess. I will try to limit myself to the perceptions of a fragile human being given occasionally to think on a subject matter.

            One reality which I see reiterated in the Charlottesville events is that if it is only with difficulty that we change anything about ourselves, it is only with that much more difficulty that we change our cultural habits. From my perspective as a Christian I have learned to look at life through a filter that sees the beauty and richness of our humanity created in God’s image. I have also learned to view our humanity in the fragility of what theologians call the sin nature. That seems almost clinical, cold, and casual. Perhaps St. Paul’s words speak more to the heart of the matter when he said that what he desired to do, he found he failed to do. Many of the faults I had before I became a Christian more than forty years ago still pop up in my life. I curse. I am impatient, aloof, tend to be lazy, self-centered, and easily discouraged and depressed. Growth in grace is more easily loved in abstract than in the more difficult day in and day out decisions requiring self-denial. We can pass laws requiring people to recognize the equality of all citizens. Those laws do not automatically transform racists, nor alleviate suspicions of racism.

            Our American history is full of racist tendencies. Our history in mistreating indigenous people and enslaving and then segregating people of color is apparent enough to need no rehashing. As a white person I know that most of what I feel pride in regarding my heritage becomes easily distracted into the things we know need changed. Our greatest sins are often our misguided attempts towards good labors. We Europeans who colonized the New World were proud of our Christian traditions, our governments rooted in law, our achievements in mastering the sciences, and our technological achievements. In several areas that seemed important we had moved to the forefront of accomplishment in those areas. There crept in to our self-understanding an idea of our own superiority of race and culture. It affected every relationship we had with other people, cultures, and races. We could justify in our superior culture the enslavement of others. We could justify the conquest of continents as if the others already in those lands did not matter. We could even imagine we were doing the good, as part of what Kipling described as “the white man’s burden.”

            To this day we who are white and Evangelical often have a view of mission or culture which makes us imagine we ought to be the undisputed leaders. I saw someone comment how Evangelicals took mission trips to poor nations, not to suburbs. The person noted that this showed an equation of prosperous with blessed and of poverty with sin. I am not sure how much that equation is true. I do tend to believe that the viewpoint of Kipling’s “white man’s burden” explains much even if the continuation of it is not necessarily conscious. I have been a member of white churches that dreamed of a mission on the poor side of town where skin color was notably more brown and black than white. We didn’t think it important to visit church leaders already in the area to see what they were doing. We didn’t offer services to a community which admittedly had needs. Instead we offered expertise on the basis of our traditions. We presumed that nothing native to their churches and their communities and their neighborhoods were as good as what we could offer. We have a whiteness tradition which affects us both as individuals and in our generally aloof white culture. I instinctively understood after Charlottesville that I had little wisdom to speak to the situation. I was on the clueless side of these issues separating America.

            My Christian faith tells me that each and every one of us have been created in God’s image. In our white pride of our traditions, we have seldom listened to African Americans or others to hear the words which reflect in their thoughts and cultures that they too have been created in God’s image. In the days following Charlottesville I resisted the temptation to write a blog. I instead shared on Facebook and Twitter two articles I regarded as profound written by one young (compared to me) African American woman, and by one Asian American woman.

            At the same conference where I met Barry Moser I heard Natasha Oladakun read two pieces of poetry she had written. She wrote of her experience of life growing up in a scenic area of Virginia, where she could love the beauty of the place but where often she was made to feel as a stranger in the land where she has spent most of her life. Her poetry was at once powerful, haunting, and melancholy. Her reading of the words she had written was mesmerizing. Even if you did not understand fully her perspective there was an undeniabe magnificence in words, reading, and presence. She has lived in Charlottesville off and on for the last five years. On Twitter her words reflected a broken heart as marchers came to her town of those who would have liked to have seen her presence erased from the Virginia hill country. You can let her speak to you through her words written here.

            The second writing to which I would like to draw your attention is by an Asian American, Ruthie Johnson. I have never met her but after reading this piece by her I value her insights regarding repentance. Repentance is that meeting place of humanity created in God’s image with a broken humanity often seeking safety as far away from love as we can remove ourselves. Her poem is a repentance prayer. She asks the Lord to recolor her eyes, so she can see what she has missed. She concludes praying “Give me lament laced with strength.” Can there be a more poignant beautiful expression of repentance than “Give me lament laced with strength?”

            In America’s Twentieth Century the struggle for equal rights was often described politically. When I read these pieces by my African American sisters I have come to realize that what we struggle for as Americans is bigger than mere politics. We struggle for the wholeness of our humanity whether white, black, indigenous, Latino, Asian or whatever. As I read these writings by Natasha Oladakun and Ruthie Johnson I had a new vision of what we struggle for. We struggle for our being created in God’s image. We struggle in being created in God’s image for the wholeness of that creation in which God made us to desperately need one another in the fullness of our humanity. Natasha asked, “If we are not here for each other, why are we here?” Ruthie noted that the soil, the earth has already absorbed its fill of blood, bones, and bodies and it groans for redemption. We battle not merely for some form of legal equality but for our own humanity, for our being created in God's image desperately needing one another.

Saturday, August 12, 2017

Arrival seeing Louise Banks


Arrival and my way of seeing Louise Banks

Written by the Panhandling Philosopher

 

            IMPORTANT NOTICE TO READERS – SPOILER ALERT:

            I wrote the following essay with an audience in mind of people who have seen the movie “Arrival” or for those less than 25 people more interested in reading my essay than seeing a wonderful movie without its plot ruined by spoilers. “Arrival” is an intelligently written and presented movie. In my opinion it would be a shame to watch it the first time having had the beauty of the unfolding plot sequences damaged by having been fed spoilers. If you haven’t seen the movie and are looking for a review that keeps from revealing too much information, then I will recommend this review by Alissa Wilkinson.[i] You’ve been forewarned! It is on you if having not seen the movie you choose to read the essay.

 

 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/df/Arrival%2C_Movie_Poster.jpg

 

            Have you noticed how in the first hundred years of cinema history movies have been created seeking a continually wider audience? In early American cinema the movie creator mostly imagined an American audience. After World War II, our alliance with other English speaking nations led to the making of movies that sought an English speaking audience from the various English speaking nations of the world. Movie makers introduced the made for movies Trans-Atlantic dialect. It presented an English that seemed sophisticated and neither American nor British. It was perhaps best personified in Audrey Hepburn. Being distinct from any actual English speaking dialect it appealed to commoners in every English speaking country as if this might be the way proper English should be spoken. In today's world, movies are crafted to seek out a global audience. Movies made in one nation will have voice overs or subtitles added to them almost instantly throughout the world. Film makers consciously seek to craft movies with global appeal built into them.

            “Arrival” seeks a global audience. Twelve alien ships arrive on planet Earth in varied parts of the world. The number twelve appeals simultaneously to varied cultural symbols. There are twelve zodiac signs in both Western and Chinese versions of the zodiac. There are twelve tribes of Israel, twelve Apostles in Christianity, twelve imams in Shiite Islam, and twelve jyothirlinga highlighted in the Hindu religion. It becomes apparent in the movie that the twelve ships are involved in transmitting to humanity a unified message where each of the twelve ships gives one piece of the entire message.

            The globalized approach to movie making sometimes bothers traditionalists who see a reductionist conspiracy to blend all cultural and spiritual identity into a lowest common denominator globalized mixture. There is a resistance to the suppression of the historic traditions in favor of a smorgasbord spirituality. There is however I think another way to respond to the film industry's attempt to reach a global audience. In a world with continual internet responses to all forms of media, the globalized movie can become a means by which we respond from our individual or collective; traditional or non-traditional perspectives. We can speak as well as listen to one another until we realize that someone seeing "Arrival" with a Christian perspective in the United States might see scenes quite differently with different resonating native perspectives implied by the film if one were Pakistani or Chinese. Movies like "Arrival" play differently to a theater in Dublin than to a theater in Singapore. There is an amazing opportunity for viewers to share perspective, shedding light on cultural responses as well as human universals experienced in viewing the film.

            For me as I watched Amy Adams present the film character Louise Banks I thought of an image of the most universal woman idealized in Western Civilization. I doubt that responses to the film in non-Christian parts of the world would view the film in such a way. I noticed that Louise Banks was called upon to help humanity find a way of resolution to the potential destruction of human civilization. She was being called upon because the world needed her to resolve a crisis. She was an expert in understanding language in its structure and also in its way to shape as well as to explain our human experience. In accord with her specialized talent set she will be made a mediator between the human and alien life forms. She will be reshaped by her encounter with the alien life form's language. The alien language represents a life form that does not experience time in a linear fashion. They experience time with the present, the past, and the future in continual relationship to one another. As Louise Banks begins to understand the alien language, she begins to be reshaped so that she begins seeing scenes of her own future. These scenes convey the needed information that will allow for a good ending to the story told in "Arrival."

            Doctor Banks envisions life with some wonderful scenes describing a caring husband and a precious daughter. Other scenes are devastating anticipations of loss and desolation. The sense of loss and desolation that she can feel as well as see leaves her asking "If you knew your whole life would you change things?" Is this fate she has impressed upon her even able to be changed?

            Throughout human history there has been a struggle among human beings to understand whether our sense of human freedom was something essential to our place in creation or whether our freedom was merely an illusion of all activity being governed by physics or biology, by fates or the absolute predestining plan of the governing Deity. No one much loves the idea of facing desolation in the future. Is there a way out? "If you knew your whole life would you change things?"

            The person I imagined as the source for the movie's depiction of Louise Banks was Mary, the mother of our Lord, as described in the canonical Scriptures of Christendom. Mary received a vision of her life in connection with the gift of the Son she was to be given. She realized in this gift from on high she would be called the most blessed among women. But there was also a sense of cost to the blessing. We often suspect she had an inkling of the cost before Simeon told her in the temple that it would be as if a sword was thrust into her soul. She would face desolation as men did what they would due to her son. She was to experience the path of suffering as well as the path of blessedness. These are the ways in which I saw Louise Banks and the Madonna having parallel lives as their stories were being told.

            There seems to me a partial resolution between the imposition of faith upon the characters and the freely chosen pursuit of life by each of them. Mary's faith provides the words that might have been spoken in Amy Adams presentation of Doctor Louise Banks. Mary having her future and her participation in the reconciliation chosen for her expresses as if in a prayer her wholehearted agreement to the proposal of the Divine invitation upon her life. She says, "Let it be done unto me according to Thy Word!" By faith she says "yes" to the entire plan presented to her. God upon seeking to redeem humankind seeks permission from a young Jewish girl to make his entrance into the world he created. As one who was once a strict Calvinist Mary's place once seemed to me to be that of an instrument necessary for the task. But a more complete and more true appreciation of what happens seems to me to be expressed in Mary as the icon of faith. She is given the whole view of her life as she is invited to give God entrance into his own world. There will be blessing and devastating desolation. Consider the costs and answer. She answered in faith choosing the blessed life alongside the inescapable acceptance of desolation.

            In "Arrival" Doctor Banks seems to make a similar choice. She has seen a caring husband that she would lose partly because of her own choices and mistakes in the relationship. She sees in her vision a precious daughter whom she would dearly love until that daughter's sickness and death would claim her before reaching the fullness of adulthood. The whole life she saw before her was a unit. Maybe she would like to have escaped the suffering, but could she really give up the years of love she would find in her husband and her daughter? She counted the cost. To escape suffering and to lose loving her husband and her daughter even if for too short a time was simply too great a sacrifice in comparison with the sacrifice of experiencing desolation in the journey. Ultimately she made the same choice as Mary. She agreed to accept her journey on the pathway given to her in her vision of the future.

            It is interesting how in seeing the character of Louise Banks in "Arrival" I found myself reevaluating my understanding of Mary. I had often viewed Mary from a great distance like many Protestants do. But I saw in Doctor Banks a truly human person seeing her future in a glimpse and realizing that though she would face desolation, she wanted that life she experienced in the vision that had come to reshape the vision she would pursue with her whole being. In a strange way Louise Banks became for me the human version I had somehow missed when I read and imagined Mary's vision.

            As I reflect on the stories of Doctor Banks and of Mary, I realize that for the Christian there is always a vision of the future that beckons us to consider life in Christ. I am not talking of some "Left Behind" envisioning of an apocalypse, but of Jesus' simple straight forward preaching. He describes a vision of life telling us "Blessed are the poor in spirit for they shall be comforted." He tells us "Blessed are the meek for we shall inherit the earth." He tells us "Blessed are the pure in heart for we shall see God." This blessed life of the Beatitudes planted in our souls becomes a vision that reshapes how and what we pursue in life. Yet, Jesus also spoke of sacrifices we would make, of struggles and temptations, of trials and tribulations, of suffering. Life is extended to us in visions containing the paired unity of blessing and suffering. Consider the happiest marriage one can imagine. The vows cut as well as encourage. The husband and wife looking upon one another as man and wife, to be shaped by Christ's relationship with the Church vow to love one another until death do them part. Every marriage is a vow to pursue life until that moment of desolation. Faith is not the escapist path from suffering, but the plunge into a vision of life worthy to throw ourselves into despite our realization that desolation is part of it all. It doesn't matter. This is a life we find worthy saying "Let it be done to me according to Thy Word."

            My understanding of “Arrival” is undoubtedly an experience of seeing the movie through a specifically Christian perspective. Yet I think people who see this movie from many different cultural perspectives would find themselves imagining through the character of Doctor Louise Banks that the possibility of a beautiful life is worthy of pursuit even if it means that life leads you to experience crushing desolation. Desolation awaits us all, but the choosing of life and of love is worth that price!

 



[i] https://www.vox.com/culture/2016/11/11/13587262/arrival-movie-review-amy-adams-denis-villeneuve