Saturday, November 1, 2014

"Leon Morin, Priest" A Movie Review


Review of the film “Leon Morin, Priest”.

Written by Dan McDonald

 

            I recently watched a 1961 French movie “Leon Morin, Priest” one of the movies within the acclaimed Criterion Collection and I want simply in this post to give you enough information to help you evaluate whether you would like to watch it for yourself.


Photo in Wikipedia article

            The 1961 movie is a film adaptation of a French novel “Leon Morin, Pretre” published in 1952. The novel was published in translated form into English in 1953; in Britain as “Leon Morin, Priest” and in the United States as “The Passionate Heart”. The story is set in a city in Axis occupied Vichy France between 1940 and 1945.

            The film’s central focus is on a widow with a young child who goes into a church one day to give her confession. She does not desire a religious experience, but has a desire to set forth her atheism to a priest. She had been raised Catholic, but later in life married a Jewish man, and became both an atheist and Communist. But now she lives in Vichy France, her husband has died and her child is being raised outside of town with hopes of keeping the child’s Jewish roots hidden from the Germans who have influence in the town. The time in the confessional begins a dialogue and friendship between her and the priest, Leon Morin.

            While the movie is focused on the relationship between this woman and the faithful if somewhat modernistic priest, a larger community begins to be seen around them. This is what I found so fascinating about the movie. After the war it was easy to see that the times of living the sort of life that was lived in Vichy France was temporary and even abnormal in the greater picture. But in the days while that era lasted it was life as its residents knew it, and as far as they were concerned this was the normal life that was their lives to live. You begin to see how the residents living that life were impacted in different ways to try to adjust their lives to the abnormal times that seemed to be permanent to those living in them.

            There were scenes of occupiers, first some Italians who treated the occupation more as a tourist’s exploration; and then the Germans whose occupation was more guided by the rigid principles of German National Socialism (Nazism). I think the movie was intentionally formed around the paradox of a way of life that seemed permanent even though it was actually quite temporary. But those involved could do no other than treat it as permanent. In such a situation there were those who questioned their lives so transformed by the new realities of the occupation. There were those seeking to rebel against the rebellion as patriots and saboteurs. There were those who sought to make the best of a situation through collaborating with the new powers.

            The temporary nature of the situation seemingly permanent to its residents also played out in other ways. France had a shortage of males. War had created thousands of widows, trying to adjust to a lack of men. The movie brings out the possible answers suggestively and almost never explicitly. The characters are nuanced. There is hardly ever any dualistic separation of heroes and villains. There is a consideration of how drives moving towards good or ill are often mixed drives rather than pure drives.

The movie seeks to lead us to contemplate the sort of passions that drive us in the ways we live life. There are nationalistic, vocational, sexual, psychological, and religious passions. The movie shows a real conversion experience which can be viewed from the perspective of a life changed by sacramental grace, or less spiritually as if it is someone’s self-driven reorientation towards a fresh start in life. The characters, whether religious, pragmatic, patriot, or collaborator are not clichéd characters but realistic human beings seeking to live out their lives in a setting that seems permanent even if temporary. Ultimately the movie seems to me a wonderful black and white film capturing without color; the nervous fragile always yearning depths of the hues and colors of our humanity.

No comments: